UNITED STATES EDITIONUS pricing. Source-backed comparisons.

US PRODUCT RESEARCH

Wrike

Work management with request workflows, resource planning, and configurable AI agents.

Checked Oct 15, 2026 Β· 9 official sources Β· Desk research
A GOOD FIT WHEN

Teams with formal delivery processes and resource or portfolio oversight.

  • Structured workflows
  • Resource and financial planning options
  • Space-level AI agents
LOOK MORE CLOSELY WHEN

You need AI agents on a free or entry-level Team subscription.

  • Advanced resource features require higher tiers
  • AI action allowance varies
  • AI addendum and admin setup required

CATEGORY-SPECIFIC EVIDENCE

Capabilities, controls and depth.

Scores combine core capabilities and workflow depth. Full support earns full points; limited support earns half. Unverified features create a range, and paid-plan requirements are shown in the evidence. How scoring works β†’

Project management Β· 28 features
74–100/100 documented fit
Core capabilities25.6–32 / 32 pts8/10 checks with established status
Workflow depth48–68 / 68 pts10/18 checks with established status
Showing fewer rows does not change the score.
Project management Β· 28 weighted capability checks
Feature / weightSupport, evidence & points
Core capabilityTasks and structured workOrganize project tasks or work items in a plan.
4 points maximum
Supported4 / 4 pts

Projects and configured workflows organize work.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityTimeline or dependency planningPlan dates or dependencies in timeline, Gantt or dependency views.
4 points maximum
Not verified0–4 / 4 pts

The reviewed documentation does not establish timeline or dependency planning at this feature level. This is an evidence gap, not a finding that the capability is absent.

Not verified Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkDependency-aware reschedulingMove linked task dates or identify downstream impact when a predecessor changes.
5.6 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Delay a predecessor and show which dependent dates or warnings change.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported5.6 / 5.6 pts

Dependent tasks reschedule with predecessors; approvals record approve/change-request decisions in the work review flow.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkBaseline or planned-versus-actual trackingCompare a saved or planned schedule with current progress or actual dates.
6.4 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Save a plan, change delivery dates and show the variance from the original plan.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported6.4 / 6.4 pts

Wrike's January 2026 release documents Gantt snapshots and baselines for comparing schedule states.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityDiscussion attached to workDiscuss work through comments, updates or project chat.
4 points maximum
Supported4 / 4 pts

Shared work supports team collaboration.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityShared documents or reviewCollaborate on documents, attachments or reviewable work within a project.
4 points maximum
Supported4 / 4 pts

Review workflows support collaboration on deliverables.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkWork or document version historyInspect prior task/document values or restore an earlier version.
5.6 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Change shared project content and show the previous version and restoration options.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported5.6 / 5.6 pts

Description version history lets users inspect prior versions and restore selected content.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkScoped external-collaborator accessLimit an external collaborator to selected work while protecting unrelated project information.
6.4 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Invite a test guest to one project and show that another project remains inaccessible.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported6.4 / 6.4 pts

Guest reviewers see only files assigned for approval, with controls for download, internal comments and access expiry; they cannot browse other project data.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityTriggered workflow automationRun configured steps when a task or project event occurs.
3.2 points maximum
Supported3.2 / 3.2 pts

Configurable workflow automation is documented.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityAutomated routing or approvalsAutomatically route work, assign it or initiate a review/approval.
3.2 points maximum
Supported3.2 / 3.2 pts

Agents can route work and initiate approvals.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkMultiple-condition workflow rulesCombine conditions before a workflow changes or routes work.
4.8 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Create a rule for an overdue high-priority item and show that a low-priority item does not trigger it.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported4.8 / 4.8 pts

Automation condition filters combine status, assignee, effort and custom-field requirements before actions run.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkApproval outcomes in the workflowCapture approval/rejection or requested changes and use that result to advance or reroute work.
4.8 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Reject an approval request and show the item returning to its owner with the decision recorded.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported4.8 / 4.8 pts

Dependent tasks reschedule with predecessors; approvals record approve/change-request decisions in the work review flow.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityCross-project portfolio visibilitySee or report across multiple projects in one view.
2.4 points maximum
Supported2.4 / 2.4 pts

Portfolio features require advanced tiers.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityResource or workload planningReview or allocate team capacity across work.
2.4 points maximum
Supported2.4 / 2.4 pts

Advanced resource planning is tier-dependent.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkCapacity and overload visibilityCompare allocated work with individual or team capacity and identify overload.
3.2 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Over-allocate a person across two projects and show where the conflict appears.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported3.2 / 3.2 pts

Professional Services supports task-to-project custom-field rollups and workload charts across projects, with overload visibility and redistribution of assigned effort.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkPortfolio progress or metric rollupsAggregate progress, dates or configured measures from multiple projects into a portfolio report.
4 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Change a project measure and show the corresponding portfolio total or status update.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported4 / 4 pts

Professional Services supports task-to-project custom-field rollups and workload charts across projects, with overload visibility and redistribution of assigned effort.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityAI work summaries or contentGenerate or summarize content using work or project context.
2.4 points maximum
Not verified0–2.4 / 2.4 pts

The reviewed documentation does not establish ai work summaries or content at this feature level. This is an evidence gap, not a finding that the capability is absent.

Not verified Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityAI-driven work actionsUse AI to classify, update, route or execute steps on work items.
2.4 points maximum
Supported2.4 / 2.4 pts

AI agents classify, route and start approvals; Business/Pinnacle/Apex and administrator enablement apply.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkAI respects work-access boundariesDocument that AI uses only work the requester or configured agent can access.
3.2 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Ask AI about a restricted project as a guest and show the boundary.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported3.2 / 3.2 pts

AI agents run within configured locations and allowed actions, with per-action filters and administrator-controlled scope. Review these permissions before enabling an agent.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkReview or scope AI work-changing actionsRequire approval or explicitly configure which work-changing actions an AI assistant/agent may perform.
4 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Ask AI to update a task and show the review step or configured action permissions.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Supported4 / 4 pts

AI agents run within configured locations and allowed actions, with per-action filters and administrator-controlled scope. Review these permissions before enabling an agent.

Official documentation Β· Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkKeep one task synchronised across multiple projectsDemonstrate: Keep one task synchronised across multiple projects. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Keep one task synchronised across multiple projects. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkIdentify the project's critical pathDemonstrate: Identify the project's critical path. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Identify the project's critical path. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkRegenerate recurring work after completionDemonstrate: Regenerate recurring work after completion. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Regenerate recurring work after completion. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkProtect public intake forms against automated spamDemonstrate: Protect public intake forms against automated spam. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Protect public intake forms against automated spam. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkRecover accidentally deleted tasks or projectsDemonstrate: Recover accidentally deleted tasks or projects. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Recover accidentally deleted tasks or projects. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkCalculate task metrics with formula fieldsDemonstrate: Calculate task metrics with formula fields. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Calculate task metrics with formula fields. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkLink dependencies between separate projectsDemonstrate: Link dependencies between separate projects. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Link dependencies between separate projects. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkDelegate an absent project approver's decisionsDemonstrate: Delegate an absent project approver's decisions. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.
2.5 points maximum
Ask for a demonstration

Demonstrate: Delegate an absent project approver's decisions. State the plan, limits and behaviour on failure. Use two linked projects and an overdue task.

A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.
Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts

This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan.

Not verified Β· Oct 21, 2026Source
Compare in Project management β†’

AI CAPABILITY CHECK

What does its AI actually do?

Native AI capabilities

Agents monitor context, classify and route work, notify teams, and start approvals.

Official AI source

Documented capabilities

  • Risk and request monitoring
  • Field and routing actions
  • Approval workflows

Limits to check

  • Business, Pinnacle, or Apex required
  • Space-admin configuration
  • Signed AI addendum and enabled generative AI

Understand the full price

Business lists $25/user/month billed annually; higher tiers require a quote.

Billing basis: annual. Unit: per user/month, annual billing. Currency: USD.

  • More AI Elite actions
  • Selected integration and security add-ons

Verify current pricing with the vendor

Integrations and deployment

  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Gmail and Outlook

Agents operate within assigned spaces; review external notification actions.

US buying context

New-purchase packaging and annual billing apply; request implementation scope.

The evidence record

Business lists $25 annual-equivalent/user/month

Official evidence

Higher tiers expand resource and budget tools

Official evidence

Agents require Business or higher

Official evidence

Agents can initiate approvals and notifications

Official evidence

Source library

  1. Plans and pricing
  2. Current agent documentation
  3. Workflow depth documentation
  4. Workflow depth documentation
  5. Workflow depth documentation
  6. Workflow depth documentation
  7. Workflow depth documentation
  8. Workflow depth documentation
  9. Workflow depth documentation

Research is based on documentation, not a hands-on performance test. Report a correction.

EXPLORE THE ALTERNATIVES

Keep your options open.

Project management alternatives Β· highest documented score first.

83–100/100 documented fit

Asana

Work management for task ownership, dependencies, portfolios, and repeatable team workflows.

Good fit forCross-functional teams linking projects to goals and capacity.
$10.99per user/month, annual billing Β· billed annually
View research
72–100/100 documented fit

ClickUp

Tasks, documents, chat, time, and AI in a configurable work-management platform.

Good fit forTeams consolidating several collaboration tools into one workspace.
$7.00per user/month, annual billing Β· billed annually
View research
67–100/100 documented fit

Smartsheet

Spreadsheet-style work management with forms, reporting, automations, and portfolio options.

Good fit forOperations and program teams comfortable with structured sheets and reports.
$9.00per member/month, annual billing Β· billed annually
View research

Your privacy choices

Optional Google Analytics runs only with your permission. Your saved shortlist stays in this browser.

Read the privacy policy