US PRODUCT RESEARCH

Ashby

A recruiting suite combining ATS, CRM, scheduling, and analytics, with an analytics-only option for some existing ATS users. Company size and paid-seat structure affect packaging and AI allowances.

Checked Oct 15, 2026 · 8 official sources · Desk research

Recruiting & applicant tracking

A GOOD FIT WHEN

Teams wanting recruiting operations and detailed analysis in a unified environment.

Integrated recruiting, sourcing, scheduling, and reporting
Analytics can be purchased for an existing ATS
Published rules for higher-volume AI credits

LOOK MORE CLOSELY WHEN

You expect a single flat AI allowance independent of plan or company size.

The pricing configurator varies by company size and term
High-volume AI features consume a shared credit allowance
More detailed reporting requires disciplined stage and field definitions

CATEGORY-SPECIFIC EVIDENCE

Capabilities, controls and depth.

Scores combine core capabilities and workflow depth. Full support earns full points; limited support earns half. Unverified features create a range, and paid-plan requirements are shown in the evidence. How scoring works →

Recruiting & applicant tracking · 28 features

54–100/100 documented fit

Core capabilities22.4–32 / 32 pts7/10 checks with established status

Workflow depth32–68 / 68 pts6/18 checks with established status

Show checksShowing fewer rows does not change the score.

Recruiting & applicant tracking · 28 weighted capability checks
Feature / weight	Support, evidence & points
Core capabilityJob posting or distributionPublish or distribute job openings to candidate-facing channels. 4 points maximum	Not verified0–4 / 4 pts The reviewed documentation does not establish job posting or distribution at this feature level. This is an evidence gap, not a finding that the capability is absent. Not verified · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityCandidate CRM or talent poolsRetain, search or re-engage prospects outside a single live application. 4 points maximum	Supported4 / 4 pts Candidate CRM sequences and talent pools are documented. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkDuplicate candidate handlingIdentify, merge or otherwise resolve duplicate candidate profiles. 5.6 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Submit the same candidate twice and show the safe deduplication or merge workflow. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Supported5.6 / 5.6 pts Candidate feeds retain the event when profiles are merged, with a documented duplicate-merge workflow. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkSearchable segmented talent poolsFilter saved candidates by structured attributes, history or pool membership. 6.4 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Find previously screened candidates with a chosen skill and exclude those already hired. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Supported6.4 / 6.4 pts Talent Rediscovery filters past candidates by criteria and prior hiring signals for follow-up. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityApplicant stagesTrack candidates through configured hiring stages. 4 points maximum	Supported4 / 4 pts ATS workflows manage applications and hiring stages. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityCandidate follow-up workflowsAutomate or coordinate candidate communications and next-step tasks. 4 points maximum	Supported4 / 4 pts CRM sequences support candidate follow-up. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkStage-triggered recruiting stepsTrigger a communication, task or configured workflow when a candidate changes stage. 5.6 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Move a test candidate to interview and show the triggered tasks or communications. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Supported5.6 / 5.6 pts Stage entry can automatically send assessments, emails and scheduling links. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkOffer or hiring approval workflowRoute an offer or hiring decision for approval before it is finalized. 6.4 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Prepare an offer outside the normal range and show the approver’s decision before sending. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Supported6.4 / 6.4 pts Offers can pass through configured approval processes before dispatch. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityInterview schedulingCoordinate interviews or offer candidate self-scheduling. 3.2 points maximum	Supported3.2 / 3.2 pts Scheduling workflows include reminders and time suggestions. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityStructured interview feedbackCapture interview notes, scorecards or structured feedback for review. 3.2 points maximum	Not verified0–3.2 / 3.2 pts The reviewed documentation does not establish structured interview feedback at this feature level. This is an evidence gap, not a finding that the capability is absent. Not verified · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkPanel or multi-part schedulingCoordinate several interviewers or interview sections with availability checks. 4.8 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Arrange a panel or multi-part interview and show how calendar conflicts are handled. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–4.8 / 4.8 pts The reviewed evidence does not establish this advanced behavior: panel or multi-part scheduling. Request the demonstration above; absence of public evidence does not establish absence of the feature. Not verified · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkControlled interview-feedback visibilityUse structured scorecards with permissions or visibility rules that protect independent feedback. 4.8 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Show what one interviewer can see before and after submitting their scorecard. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Supported4.8 / 4.8 pts Organization visibility settings control whether interviewers can see other feedback before their interview. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityRecruiting-funnel reportsReport on applicant progress or conversion through hiring stages. 2.4 points maximum	Supported2.4 / 2.4 pts Integrated recruiting analytics are documented. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityCandidate-source reportsReport on sourcing channels or candidate-source outcomes. 2.4 points maximum	Not verified0–2.4 / 2.4 pts The reviewed documentation does not establish candidate-source reports at this feature level. This is an evidence gap, not a finding that the capability is absent. Not verified · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkStage-duration or bottleneck analysisReport time spent in hiring stages or aging applicants. 3.2 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Find the slowest stage for one job using actual stage timestamps. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–3.2 / 3.2 pts The reviewed evidence does not establish this advanced behavior: stage-duration or bottleneck analysis. Request the demonstration above; absence of public evidence does not establish absence of the feature. Not verified · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkExport detailed recruiting report dataExport recruiting report rows for independent reconciliation or analysis. 4 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Export the sample funnel/source report and reconcile totals with its candidate records. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–4 / 4 pts The reviewed evidence does not establish this advanced behavior: export detailed recruiting report data. Request the demonstration above; absence of public evidence does not establish absence of the feature. Not verified · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityAI candidate review or rediscoveryUse documented AI to assist application review, matching or candidate rediscovery. 2.4 points maximum	Supported2.4 / 2.4 pts Application review and talent rediscovery consume plan credits. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Core capabilityAI interview or recruiting contentGenerate interview notes, questions, job content or scheduling assistance. 2.4 points maximum	Supported2.4 / 2.4 pts AI scheduling assistance is documented. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkEvidence-backed AI candidate assistanceShow the resume, profile, transcript or other source information supporting an AI recruiting result. 3.2 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Open the evidence behind an AI match, review result or interview summary. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Supported3.2 / 3.2 pts AI summaries are generated from candidate-profile or interview-briefing feedback that the reviewer can inspect. Official documentation · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkHuman control over AI hiring outcomesDocument review, approval or opt-in controls so AI assistance does not itself make the final hiring decision. 4 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Show how a recruiter accepts, changes or rejects an AI recommendation before a candidate-facing action. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–4 / 4 pts The reviewed evidence does not establish this advanced behavior: human control over ai hiring outcomes. Request the demonstration above; absence of public evidence does not establish absence of the feature. Not verified · Oct 15, 2026Source
Depth checkExport AI screening criteria and output for reviewDemonstrate “Export AI screening criteria and output for review” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Export AI screening criteria and output for review” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkReserve buffers between candidate-booked interviewsDemonstrate “Reserve buffers between candidate-booked interviews” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Reserve buffers between candidate-booked interviews” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkLocate failed candidate automations with a reasonDemonstrate “Locate failed candidate automations with a reason” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Locate failed candidate automations with a reason” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkTrack a vacancy against an approved headcount budgetDemonstrate “Track a vacancy against an approved headcount budget” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Track a vacancy against an approved headcount budget” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkRenew talent-pool consent before its recorded expiryDemonstrate “Renew talent-pool consent before its recorded expiry” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Renew talent-pool consent before its recorded expiry” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkCredit an employee referral to the correct applicationDemonstrate “Credit an employee referral to the correct application” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Credit an employee referral to the correct application” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkLimit an external interviewer to assigned interviewsDemonstrate “Limit an external interviewer to assigned interviews” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Limit an external interviewer to assigned interviews” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source
Depth checkReschedule an interview from the recruiter mobile appDemonstrate “Reschedule an interview from the recruiter mobile app” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. 2.5 points maximum Ask for a demonstration Demonstrate “Reschedule an interview from the recruiter mobile app” with a sample record; show the result, permissions and required plan. A scenario to run with the supplier; not a completed product test.	Not verified0–2.5 / 2.5 pts This specific check has not been verified. Missing evidence does not mean the capability is absent. Ask for a demonstration in the proposed plan. Not verified · Oct 21, 2026Source

Compare in Recruiting & applicant tracking →

AI CAPABILITY CHECK

What does its AI actually do?

Native AI capabilities

AI assists applications, candidate rediscovery, scheduling, and recruiting questions. Some capabilities are unmetered while high-volume features use credits.

Official AI source

Documented capabilities

AI-assisted application review
Talent rediscovery
AI scheduling and conversational assistance

Limits to check

Foundations documents 1,500 monthly or 18,000 annual account credits
Plus documents 2,500 annual credits per paid seat; Enterprise 12,500
Application review, fraud detection, and rediscovery can consume credits

Understand the full price

Foundations targets organizations up to 100 employees; larger Plus and Enterprise plans use tailored pricing. Confirm the configurator's company-size and billing selection.

Billing basis: quote. Unit: organization / paid seats. Currency: USD.

Higher-volume AI credits
Analytics-only packaging has separate eligibility and pricing

Verify current pricing with the vendor

Integrations and deployment

Existing ATS connection for the analytics product
Email and calendar workflows

Review who can access applicant data, analytics exports, and AI actions; plan and administrator configuration matter.

US buying context

US recruiting buyers should model applicant volume and paid seats separately when forecasting cost.

The evidence record

Foundations targets companies with up to 100 employees.

Official evidence

The suite includes sourcing, ATS, scheduling, and analytics.

Official evidence

AI credit allowances vary between Foundations, Plus, and Enterprise.

Official evidence

Application review, fraud detection, and rediscovery can consume credits.

Official evidence

Source library

Research is based on documentation, not a hands-on performance test. Report a correction.

EXPLORE THE ALTERNATIVES

Keep your options open.

Recruiting & applicant tracking alternatives · highest documented score first.

42–100/100 documented fit

Greenhouse

An applicant tracking and recruiting platform for teams formalizing sourcing, interviews, and hiring decisions. The relevant choice is the depth of process control, rather than a public per-recruiter price.

Good fit forGrowing recruiting teams that want repeatable interviews, a candidate CRM, and tiered governance.

Custom quoteorganization

View research

39–100/100 documented fit

Rippling

A modular employee platform linking HR, payroll, benefits, recruiting, and business automation.

Good fit forCompanies that need workflows and reporting across several employee-related systems.

Custom quoteper employee/month plus base and modules

View research

38–100/100 documented fit

Lever

An ATS and candidate relationship platform connecting sourcing, interview records, and hiring analytics. Its published packaging distinguishes core AI assistance from additional screening products.

Good fit forRecruiting teams combining active applicants with ongoing candidate nurture campaigns.

Custom quoteorganization

View research